Nano Brain Implant for “mind control”
Nano-implants for mind control, heaven or hell?
By: MIND TECH SWEDEN
The conventions have once been established to protect people from abusive research is neutralized through “nano technology”.
Where is the supervisory / regulatory framework that monitors and prevents experimentation with microelectronics in human beings?
Where is the knowledge that can assist people who consider themselves victims of experiments with nano electronics?
Nano electronics are so small it can’t be seen and it is impossible to trace.
It is also very difficult to prove that this exists and that enables grotesque abusive computer-brain research that is literally killing more people every day…
The current governments and politicians puts the blame on each other and everyone else so one takes responsibility.
One of the greatest experiments of all time. People are “employed” in abusive research (these are the people who imposes the new brain implants without the victims approval or infomed consent) and for the rest of their lives they are directly connected to the researchers computers, “cloning” these peoples brain and nervous system (consciousness) in a brain-like computer.
Nano technology is a new industrial revolution of man.
Maria Strömme says the Research Council’s book “Where the gold glitters blue” to “We’re just at the beginning of a new industrial revolution. Not even ten to fifteen years, we will be close to see the full impact of nano technology. We are about where the development of the computer was in the 1950s. “
Research Council had a workshop in 2004 where they said they would like to start an ethical debate on nanotechnology ethics. Professor Goran Hermerén, part of the Research Council’s ethics group, wrote in 2005 a 30-page document to the European Court ethics group and warned against abuse of this technology. In 2007 the Research Council published a book “Where the gold glitters blue” about nano technology revolution. Below are some quotes from the book on this.
What is nano electronics? “In recent decades we have seen electronics shrink beyond what we can see with the naked eye. The great revolution will be the day we take the actual step towards nano electronics. This takes a supercomputer to be held on the surface of a blood cell, the latest movies will be shown through a projector thin as a hair, and you will be able to store your music and all the world in a small earring. The day will come today’s nano gadgets that seem like electronic dinosaurs. “
Mind Control – a new ethical problem!
“Linking the human brain to a computer via electrodes, open of course frightening possibilities. Will it be feasible to control a man’s thoughts “?
“It’s important ethical aspects of this. One could of course theoretically able to control brain functions and modify people’s personality.
For example, make them more or less aggression prone or the learning ability by adding to chronic stimulation. It’s like with anything else, in that the knowledge is there, you can use it in many ways, “says Göran Lundborg.
To discuss these issues, they have established an ethic group to the project. Ulf Görman, ethicists at the Center for Theology and Religious Studies at Lund University, is one of the participants. “An important part of the ethical evaluation is to weigh benefits against risks. But perhaps the most important thing is to show respect for the individual and the individual’s self-determination “says Ulf Görman.
A number of ethical statements have been introduced to prevent similar attacks on humans, including the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 took up the subject. In 1997, also signed the EU Member States’ Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine “in the Spanish city of Oviedo. UN Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights must not be forgotten and it was written back in 1948!
- “These declarations have been added in response to the abuse of people who were in World War II,” said Ulf Görman. Oviedo Convention and other European regulations have resulted in new legislation in Sweden. For example, Privacy Act, which came into force in 1998, and the Act on Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans, which came into force in 2004. Ulf Görman mean that when we do a retrospective, it is easy for us to distinguish between unethical and ethical good research.
“But now we open the doors to an unknown area where we do not know how to apply ethics.What should it be accepted and what should not be allowed when you can make electrode implants that can both influence and learn of the brain “? says Ulf Görman.
He takes the example of examining learning and memory. “Micro-Implants can provide unprecedented opportunities to understand how we learn to remember things, and hence why we forget and find it difficult to learn. While it may be perceived as a form of abuse that like that look into our most private mental world, “said Ulf Görman.
Media to create debates seem to have been reached by the information.Conventions on Human Rights, to protect people from abuse, has, with nanotechnology and nano research has become toothless agreements. Nothing is written about this catastrophic situation.
The lack of information has resulted in a civilian / military regime graduate with interests in human-machine integration is allowed to exist in Sweden.
Until politicians have taken a decision state of emergency for experiments on humans without informed consent. The market, not ethics, control entirely in the new nano revolution. Nanotechnology is going to be so important that it not even possible to evaluate the number of billions of dollars. It is thus immense amount of this new technology will transform and nobody wants to let go of the dance of the golden calf. Human lives and laws carry no weight.
In recent decades, meetings between information technology, biotechnology, and neurology are using nanotechnology brought a whole new area of research, which is developing completely new, previously unknown products and services.
We’ve said ‘yes’ without much protest to the electronic evolution “first wave”. When we are referring to the cheap microprocessor that made the PC to every man’s tools. “The second wave” came creeping up – even without objection. A series of inexpensive electronic device (laser, Internet, broadband, and mobile phone), it has become obvious parts of our everyday lives.
But now it gets serious. Now in the “third wave”, it also applies “connection” to the brain, which means both the enormous benefits, but also equally huge disadvantage människan.Nackdelarna include complex legal implications, affecting the identity and integrity.
INFO-BIONIC CHALLENGING SOCIETY
In the biological field, we must acquaint ourselves with “smart” devices and tools, which stimulate and motivate the human central nervous system. It also outlines inplanterande of smart prostheses in the human body. The direct contact between these “smart” chips, and our central nervous system, pointing to a symbiosis (living together), between brain and computer. This new sphere, which is named info-bionic, challenge all the traditional values of society and its ethical standards.
Numerous industries are already involved: Analogic Computer Services already numerous industries with CNN. Checking the quality of the textile and paper industries.Controls the speed and security of rail, helicopter and air traffic and in power stations.Inspecting high-speed production and quality review, with amazing speed, agricultural products, fruits and vegetables. In addition, traditional robots equipped with flexible and human movement pattern, copied by human behavior.
Visually impaired people can look again: is currently being feverish research in the retina, the retina works. All in order to create acceptable synproteser for the blind, the disabled are not innate. And prospects are good with CNN. Although it is very difficult to achieve a stable and constant contact between synprotes and nervous system. The process is extremely complex, with nanotechnology, a breakthrough has been made. It is about several hundred or a thousand connections.
Even handicapped with paralyzed limbs can count on positive solutions. Neuro Tech Raports, San Francisco, believes that this market was soon to be worth approximately $ 3.6 billion.
Direct connection to the brain: It is undoubtedly the most complex task. Here, the dangers are as great as the opportunities. There are also bio-ethical responsibility much greater than in those areas, which so far we have touched and the limitation of the commercial profit hunger is therefore highly desirable. The same technology used to control the body prostheses can be used to determine human relations between language and thought.
The establishment of electronic contact with the central nervous system brings tremendous advantages. Among other things, as a precaution. You can for instance get the warning signs of impending epileptic seizures. In addition, it calls for a wide range of neurological and psychotic prophylactic doubles.
Are Swedish politicians so unaware that they trust scientists as expert skills as dual roles where private interests in companies and patents often occur, would not be corrupt and mislead policy makers?
Now it’s about completely new markets and patents with huge amounts of money and prestige in nano technology for integration between computer and brain.
This whole area of research seems to be undermined by nepotism and corruption. This is long before anyone even allowed to see any result of the enormous financial priorities that area received.
People exposed to the experiment (the integration between computer chip and the brain with a network-based multimedia connection) are diagnosed as nut-cases and schizophrenic by the mental health system in stead of providing them with adequate help.
This use of science is made possible because of withheld research reports, which in turn results in lack of politically correct decision to law.
A deliberate concealment of facts for political decisions on new legislation, leading to outdated diagnoses is executed by the medical profession and the judiciary.
People who suffer abuse can not pull charges against a technology that lacks scientific evidence. This manipulation has resulted in more hidden miscarriage of justice.
The computer scientists are using teachable computers to maintain dialogue directly with the brain for pattern identification for mind reading makes crimes .
The researchers are using constant stimuli through implants to “milk the brain” makes technology to serious torture.
The researchers’ experiments include the invisible violence / pain from the implants to force people into submission, there is no words for.
That research uses brain copy to record different medication’s effects, medications given to counteract the effects of implant technology design is a foul way to meet the development of tomorrow’s medicines.
Note that the pharmaceutical industry is well on its way to becoming dirtier than the arms industry.
Modern consciousness and language research that develops a platform, (brain-like computer) can not use animals for their software. Research projects require active healthy people with an active brain working in their natural environment. By withholding of research reports, this implies that ignorant people are now injected in Swedish hospitals.
The implants referred to here are of the officially funded and developed to, among other things to help people with “locked in syndrome” to communicate, and to replace a partial memory corruption caused by stroke. To help the disabled to control devices and to “win the soldiers on the ground”. The implants are also described to be used to eg identify repeat offenders, stalkers and terrorism. The implants are neurally integrated with the brain and nervous system.
Several volunteers can testify that these implants also on command can cause seizures and cardiac arrest, and knock out the body’s balance system. The experiments carried out on civilians in the middle of our society.
What does the Swedish and international weapons laws on implants that can be used via an internet connection as a new invisible lethal weapons?
Research Council’s ethics group pronounce it this way when we point out that research is ongoing abuse of nanotechnology and that people are driven to distraction by technology. “You have no proof”! “The precautionary principle applies in Sweden regarding research of nanotechnology, one must weigh the benefits against the neck divide r”.Research Council refers the matter and the responsibility to the Central Ethical Review Board. It seems strange, Research Council’s lawyers have in the answer darkened his own ethics debate by saying that there is no proof!
The answer is that the Research Council’s Ethical Council and the debate on nano-ethics and related academic skills and expertise is darkened. This also means that the Research Council consciously both protects and supports research on humans, although it is unethical.
With regard to ethical review and obtaining of informed consent, it goes without saying that research is an outrage and a violation of human rights, where physical and psychological risks are unknown and which by their nature can not be traced, not communicated and tested in an ethics board. In this way the destruction of people’s life’s work and the Swedish research institutes are allowed to participate and perform hidden experiments on people in their research.
Representatives of government must familiarize themselves with the research progress.Information is only available in two camps, the researchers and the victims. Alternatively, the economic forces’ interests in order to communicate, control and manipulate human behavior through brain implants to continue to be abused. There is already a large number of people living under heavy torture forms online to research computers for both civilian and military interests and products. This does great harm and misery for particularly children and families of the victims.
Scientists selects not even his choice of subjects without implanting totally innocent people with families, children and jobs. This puts the Swedish researchers in their own irreverent class by itself. Whole families have been completely devastated in the last five years.
All researchers and companies involved in the development of technology computer-brain integration and software to be confronted with the technologies also can be abused and used in such a way that, with invisible violence and prolonged manipulation of the psyche can drive people to perform t as murder, insane hetsbrott mm. How does the Swedish government its citizens from this?
The researchers are granted the right to freely choose methods to collect their data is an unfortunate situation when the nano-electronics and software for network based communication directly with the brain develops.
A global network access, is a risk to national security. Security Service ignores fn a position for the same reason that politicians, ie researchers withholding of technology existence.
We demand that the government immediately makes experts in evidence-based research against the wall and forcing information on these technologies, as the developmentand application in Sweden.
Research needs, in itself, is not stopped, but it must be coated ethics and human torture suffered by many families must be stopped. This has nothing to do with ethical research to do.
Current regulator for abuse with högteknoligsk nanoelectronics for computer-brain integration is the Swedish psychiatric care. The Government’s position, drive and control, in this interdisciplinary subject, which will determine if more healthy family life is destroyed.
By Magnus Olsson